WHO Coronavirus Covid-19 Warning

W A R N I N G ! 

The World Health Organization has determined that voting for listening to Donald J. Trump is hazardous to your health.

Too Many Unanswered Questions Regarding the Administration's Inability to Provide the Necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) For Our Health Care Workers

Why do the governors have to bid against each other to acquire the necessary PPE for their health care workers?

Why doesn't the President invoke the Defense Production Act to manufacture and procure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)?

Why doesn't the American Chamber of Commerce want the President to invoke the Defense Production Act to manufacture and procure the necessary PPE?

Is Jared Kushner running an off-government crisis response team during this pandemic?

Is Jared Kushner's off-government response team interfering with the government's response to the pandemic?

Are the actions and inactions of the government  regarding the acquisition of PPE putting the lives of our health care workers at risk?

These questions need to be asked now.  And they should be answered now.

If not now, when?

Donald Trump and the Lack of Preparations for the Coronavirus

Last month, responding to a question from a reporter about why he has consistently called for “enormous cuts to the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO,” Trump responded:

“I’m a businessperson. I don’t like having thousands of people around when you don’t need them. When we need them, we can get them back very quickly."

Click on the Hyperlinks Above the Images to Read the Articles 



James West, Deputy Editor, Digital, Mother Jones:

Beth Cameron, Former Senior Director for Global Health Security and Biodefense:

The Impeachment was Real. The Trial was a Hoax.

 
         Our Country?  Victory?  Impeachment Hoax?

75% of the American public wanted to hear witnesses at the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump.

            But Republican Senators voted that no witnesses would be permitted  to testify.


57% of the American public wanted to give the House Managers the opportunity to present new evidence at the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump.

            But Republican Senators voted that no new evidence would be allowed to be presented.


Donald J. Trump withheld military aid to the Ukraine in exchange for help in the 2020 election.

            Republicans voted that Donald J. Trump was not guilty of Abuse of Power.

Donald J. Trump ordered his cabinet officials not to testify at the House Impeachment Hearing.

Moreover, he directed government agencies to ignore subpoenas for evidence relevant to the impeachment investigation.

             Republicans voted that Donald J. Trump was not guilty of Obsrtruction of Congress.

             The Impeachment was Real.  The Trial was a Hoax.

The Imminent Threat is Donald Trump

     Make no mistake about it.  The imminent threat to the United States of America is Donald Trump.  Whatever is in his best interests is the course of action he will take for the nation, regardless of the consequences.
     The Trump Administration has said that the assassination of General Soleimani was justified because he was an imminent threat to American lives.  Yet, the Administration has not provided Congress with any evidence to show that Soleimani's killing was justified.  Nor did it brief Congress before the assassination.  And I wonder if Trump thought thru the consequences of his action.
     Before the election in 2012, Donald Trump predicted that Barack Obama would start a war with Iran before the election.  He believed that was the only way President Obama could be reelected.
      Now we are really on the brink of a war with Iran, not only before another election, but while Donald Trump is facing an impeachment trial.  He has already tweeted that the Impeachment HOAX needs to be over and done with because he has more important matters to deal with –– matters of his own doing.
     Donald Trump has already said that the United States will attack 52 targets, including Iranian cultural sites, if Iran retaliates to the Soleimani killing.
    No one seems to have mentioned what Russia or China will do if Trump follows through on his threats.  I doubt that either Russia or China will stand idly by while Trump annihilates Iran....
    So what must Congress do?
    Congress must decide if Donald Trump himself is the imminent threat.   Congress needs to demand to see the evidence from the Trump Administration that the killing of General Soleimani was justified.  What was the imminent threat? If there was not an imminent threat, then Congress needs to include the additional facts into the articles of impeachment:  That in authorizing the assassination of General Soleimani, Donald Trump compromised the security of the United States for personal political gain.
     And then Congress must impeach the President.
 
   
   
   
   

Vice President Mike Pence on Impeachment

This business of high crimes and misdemeanors goes to the question of whether or not the person serving as President of the United States put their own interests, their personal interests, ahead of public service.

         Michael Pence, House of Representative, July 25, 2008



     Mike Pence's words on impeachment are one of three epigraphs that Neal Katyal quoted in the beginning of his book,  Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump, Boston: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt, 2019.

     Katyal calls Pence's words the "Pence Standard," and cites it several times in his book, all the while making the case why Donald Trump needs to be impeached. Katyal believes that Pence's quote "perfectly distills why our founders believed Congress has an obligation to hold accountable a President who abuses the power of his office."

     Pence's quote is actually a statement he referenced from a witness's report during a congressional hearing on July 25, 2008.   The hearing was entitled "Executive Power and its Constitutional Limitation," and is well worth revisiting, as is Pence's reasoning for using the quote.

     The Democrats controlled the House in 2008, and the July 25, 2008 hearing was the second session of the House Judiciary Committee Hearing on Executive Power and its Constitutional Limitations.  John Conyers, Chair of the Judiciary Committee, called the hearing to  discuss the separation of powers and the perceived excesses of the executive branch of President Bush.

     The Judiciary Committee previously held 45 separate hearings on perceived executive abuse of power, including the manipulation of intelligence regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the ordering of the illegal use of torture, the outing of Valerie Plame, the firing of U. S. Attorneys for political purposes, and the obstruction of congressional oversight by ignoring subpoenas of witnesses called to appear before Congress.

     It should be noted that the House never voted to authorize a hearing of the Judiciary Committee on the topic of Impeachment. Nevertheless, that's exactly what the July 25, 2008 hearing was about under the guise of another name.

     Each member of the Judiciary Committee was permitted to make an opening statement, and in his Pence began by addressing the elephant in the room:

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I note this hearing is entitled "Executive Power and Congressional Limitations." And I want to say that I accept the Chairman's assurance that it was not his intention to convene a hearing today on the topic of impeachment. But I know that many here on both sides of the rostrum and many looking in are anxious to debate whether the 43rd President of the United States should be impeached. And I would like to address myself to that issue in my opening remarks.

     Pence went over the reasons why a President could be impeached: for treason bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.  Pence immediately ruled out treason and bribery, and that left high crimes and misdemeanors.  He then referred to the testimony of Stephen Presser, Professor of Legal History at Northwestern University School of Law, who testified that high crimes and misdemeanors pertained to actions where "the President put his personal interests above the Constitution and the laws of the Nation, thereby violating his oath of office."  Pence maintained that since 9/11 President Bush always put the country's interests ahead of his own.

     Later, when it was Pence's turn to question the witnesses,  he directed his questions solely to Presser. In his report to the Committee, Presser elaborated that James Madison and George Mason argued about whether the term malAdministration, differences in the administration of and pursuit of different policies, should be included as a basis for impeachment.  Madison won the argument and the term malAdministration was not included in the Constitution.

Pence then asked Presser this rhetorical question:

It seems to me, though, you make a point in your report that this business of high crimes and misdemeanors goes to the question of whether or not the person serving as President of the United States put their own interests, their personal interests, ahead of public service.

     Pence then recounted Presser's testimony ten years earlier in the allegations against President Clinton.  Presser had testified that if the allegations against President Clinton were true, that Clinton engaged in deception, lied under oath, concealed evidence, tampered with witnesses, and, in general, obstructed justice, that it showed that President Clinton put his personal interests above public service.  Pence then continued:

Mr. Pence: Do you see any evidence of any of these policy differences with the current Administration the same types of -- same type of conduct that would be high crimes and misdemeanors?
Mr. Presser: No, sir.
Mr. Pence: That is the briefest law school professor I have ever met in my life....

Fast forward to January 2020 and the Impeachment Trail of President Donald J. Trump.  If 100 Senators of the United States applied the Pence Standard, that the President of the United States put his own personal interests above the country's interests, would President Trump be found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors and removed from office?

The Moral Code of John and Joan Q. Citizen: Impeachment, The Final Roll Call

     "Duty, Honor, Country' – those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be...

     The code which those words perpetuate embraces the highest moral law and will stand the test of any ethics or philosophies ever promoted for the uplift of mankind. Its requirements are for the things that are right, and its restraints are from the things that are wrong...

     Others will debate the controversial issues, national and international, which divide men's minds. But serene, calm, aloof, you stand as the Nation's war guardians, as its lifeguards from the raging tides of international conflict, as its gladiators in the arena of battle.

     Let civilian voices argue the merits or demerits of our process of government: whether our strength is being sapped by deficit financing indulged too long, by federal paternalism grown too mighty, by power groups grown too arrogant, by politics grown too corrupt, by crime grown too rampant, by morals grown too low, by taxes grown too high, by extremists grown too violent; whether our personal liberties are as firm and complete as they should be; thse great national problems are not for your professional participation or military solution. Your guidepost stands out like a tenfold beacon in the night: Duty, Honor, Country...."

    Douglas MacArthur, Farewell Address at West Point

     In this current crisis, it is time for civilian voices to be heard. No matter what party they belong to, John and Joan Q. Citizen must echo the moral code of the soldier:      'Duty, Honor, Country.'  As citizens, we have the responsibility, no, the duty, to hold our elected officials to the highest standards – to perform their duties in accordance with the rule of law.

     John and Joan Q. Citizen know what needs to be done.  But do they have the honor, the integrity, to say and do what's right for the good of the country?  The soldier has to say, "Mine is not to reason why; mine is but to do or die."  Our Congressional Representatives must pledge allegiance to their party or they may not get re-elected.  Half of them say, "Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!"  The other half says, "Yes Sir, Yes Sir! Three Bags Full," while thinking, "Wrong! Wrong! Wrong!"  What do John and Joan Q. Citizen have to say?  What should they say?

     Clearly, we are in a crisis! These are the times that try men's souls....  

     We, as citizens, must strip away our party affiliation, re-examine our own moral code, and apply it to the situation at hand.

     If President Obama, or any other President, solicited foreign interference to help win a Presidential Election, would we impeach him?

     If President Obama, or any other President, withheld military aid to a country at war with Russia until that country investigated a political opponent in an upcoming election, would we impeach him?

     If the President obstructed justice while impeding an investigation of his actions, would we impeach him?

     Civilians have a moral code they must abide by too.  Most Democrats, I believe, would choose country over party.  And if President Obama did all the actions above, Democrats, I believe, would still want him impeached;  no one, not even  President Obama, is above the law.  The question is, do Republicans have that same moral code.  Will they choose country over party?

This is the final roll call.  Let your voice be heard.